#Permuted basement Macdonald E polynomials

The permuted-basement Macdonald polynomials (also called relative Macdonald polynomials [GR21]) generalize the non-symmetric Macdonald polynomials, by introducing an additional parameter \(\sigma \in \symS_n,\) the basement. They were introduced in [Fer11] by J. Ferreira as eigenpolynomials of certain operators. Later, in [Ale19], a combinatorial model was introduced. For some properties of these formulas, see [AS17, AS19].

A good overview and introduction to this topic is [GR21, GR21].

S. Corteel, O. Mandelshtam, and L. Williams connect multiline queues with Macdonald polynomials via the exclusion process [CMW18].

#Permuted-basement \(t\)-atoms

At \(q=0,\) the permuted-basement Macdonald polynomials become permuted-basement \(t\)-atoms. Alexandersson and Sawhney study these polynomials using basement-permuting operators and fillings [AS19].

#Permuted-basement atoms

Setting \(t=0\) in the permuted-basement \(t\)-atoms gives permuted-basement atoms. In the basement convention of [AS19], the identity basement gives ordinary Demazure atoms, while the longest basement gives key polynomials.

#Demazure \(t\)-atoms

The identity-basement case of the permuted-basement \(t\)-atoms is the family of Demazure \(t\)-atoms. They specialize at \(t=0\) to ordinary Demazure atoms. These are not the same as the generalized Demazure atoms of J. Haglund, S. Mason, and J. B. Remmel.

#Definitions

The following section is mainly from [Ale19], with the filling product written in the Ferreira–Moura–Mandelshtam convention.

Let \(\sigma = (\sigma_1,\dotsc,\sigma_n)\) be a list of \(n\) distinct positive integers and let \(\alpha=(\alpha_1,\dotsc,\alpha_n)\) be a weak integer composition. An augmented filling of shape \(\alpha\) and basement \(\sigma\) is a filling of a Young diagram of shape \((\alpha_1,\dotsc,\alpha_n)\) with positive integers, augmented with a zeroth column filled from top to bottom with \(\sigma_1,\dotsc,\sigma_n.\)

Note that we use English notation rather than the skyline fillings used in [HHL08, Mas09]. For example, the following figure illustrates the difference, where the English notation is used in the left diagram, while the skyline convention is used in the right diagram.

$6$ $5$ $5$   $5$       $4$       $3$ $3$ $4$ $2$ $2$ $2$     $1$ $1$ $6$       $2$       $6$   $4$     $5$ $1$ $2$ $3$     $5$ $1$ $2$ $3$ $4$ $5$ $6$

In the skyline convention, the basement appears at the bottom of the diagram, thus explaining the peculiar choice of terminology.

G. Z. D. e. Moura and O. Mandelshtam give probabilistic entry-swapping bijections for non-attacking fillings [MM25].

Definition

Let \(F\) be an augmented filling. Two boxes \(a\) and \(b\) are attacking if \(F(a)=F(b)\) and the boxes are either in the same column, or they are in adjacent columns, with the rightmost box in a row strictly below the other box.

$a$ $ \vdots$ $ b$

or

$a $   $ \vdots$     $ b$

A filling is non-attacking if there are no attacking pairs of boxes.

Definition

A triple of type \(A\) is an arrangement of boxes, \(a,\) \(b,\) \(c,\) located such that \(a\) is immediately to the left of \(b,\) and \(c\) is somewhere below \(b,\) and the row containing \(a\) and \(b\) is at least as long as the row containing \(c.\) Similarly, a triple of type \(B\) is an arrangement of boxes, \(a,\) \(b,\) \(c,\) located such that \(a\) is immediately to the left of \(b,\) and \(c\) is somewhere above \(a,\) and the row containing \(a\) and \(b\) is strictly longer than the row containing \(c.\)

A type \(A\) triple is an inversion triple if the entries ordered increasingly form a counter-clockwise orientation. Similarly, a type \(B\) triple is an inversion triple if the entries ordered increasingly form a clockwise orientation. If two entries are equal, the one with largest subscript in the figures below is considered largest.

Type \(A:\)

$a_3 $ $ b_1$   $ \vdots$   $ c_2$

Type \(B:\)

$c_2 $   $ \vdots $   $ a_3 $ $ b_1$

If \(u = (i,j)\) let \(d(u)\) denote \((i,j-1).\) A descent in \(F\) is a non-basement box \(u\) such that \(F(d(u)) \lt F(u).\) The set of descents in \(F\) is denoted \(\Des(F).\)

Example

Here is a non-attacking filling of shape \((4,1,3,0,1)\) and basement \((4,5,3,2,1).\) The bold entries are descents and the underlined entries form a type \(A\) inversion triple. There are in total \(7\) inversion triples (of type \(A\) and \(B\)).

$\underline{4} $ $ \underline{2} $ $ 1 $ $ \textbf{2} $ $ 4$ $ 5 $ $ 5$       $ 3 $ $ 3 $ $ \textbf{4} $ $ 3$   $ 2$         $ 1 $ $ \underline{1}$      

The leg, \(\leg(u),\) of a box \(u\) in a diagram is the number of boxes to the right of \(u\) in the diagram. The arm, denoted \(\arm(u),\) of a box \(u = (r,c)\) in a diagram \(\alpha\) is defined as the cardinality of the sets \[\begin{aligned} \{ (r', c) \in \alpha : r \lt{} r' \text{ and } \alpha_{r'} \leq \alpha_r \} \text{ and } \\ \{ (r', c-1) \in \alpha : r' \lt{} r \text{ and } \alpha_{r'} \lt{} \alpha_r \}. \end{aligned}\]

The major index of an augmented filling \(F\) is defined as \[\begin{aligned} \maj(F) = \sum_{ u \in \Des(F) } \leg(u)+1. \end{aligned}\] The number of inversions, \(\inv(F),\) of a filling is the number of inversion triples of either type. The number of coinversions, \(\coinv(F),\) is the number of type \(A\) and type \(B\) triples that are not inversion triples.

Let \(\mathrm{NAF}_\sigma(\alpha)\) denote the set of all non-attacking fillings of shape \(\alpha,\) augmented with the basement \(\sigma \in \symS_n,\) with all entries in the fillings from \([n].\)

Definition

Let \(\sigma \in \symS_n\) and let \(\alpha\) be a weak composition with \(n\) parts. The non-symmetric permuted basement Macdonald polynomial \(\macdonaldE^\sigma_\alpha(\xvec;q,t)\) is defined as

\[\macdonaldE^\sigma_\alpha(\xvec; q,t) = \sum_{ F \in \mathrm{NAF}_\sigma(\alpha)} \xvec^F q^{\maj(F)} t^{\coinv(F)} \prod_{ \substack{ u \in F \\ u \text{ is not in the basement} \\ F(d(u))\neq F(u) }} \frac{1-t}{1-q^{1+\leg(u)} t^{1+\arm(u)}}.\] The product is over all boxes \(u\) in \(F\) not in the basement, satisfying \(F(d(u))\neq F(u).\)

Remark (Source conventions).

The product range in the displayed formula above is the one used by Ferreira and by Moura–Mandelshtam [Def. 2.1, MM26]. The printed formula in [Def. 5, Ale19] includes basement boxes in this product. This should not be used literally: basement boxes may enter the arm sets of ordinary boxes, but they are not themselves product indices. This is also the convention implemented in Sage’s nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomial code [Sag19].

There is a second convention issue in the operator formula. In [Rem. 2.7, MM25], Moura–Mandelshtam note that the published definition of \(\mathrm{twinv}(\alpha,\sigma)\) in [Ale19] has the inequality involving \(\sigma\) reversed. The corrected convention is \[\mathrm{twinv}(\alpha,\sigma) \coloneqq \left|\{(i,j): i\lt{}j,\ \alpha_i\geq\alpha_j,\ \sigma_i\lt{}\sigma_j\}\right|.\]

Example (A four-filling check).

Let \(\alpha=(1,1,0,1)\) and let \(\sigma=(2,4,1,3).\) In the English convention used here, the four non-attacking fillings in \(\mathrm{NAF}_\sigma(\alpha)\) are \[\begin{aligned} F_1&:\ (2\mid 1),\ (4\mid 4),\ (1\mid \emptyset),\ (3\mid 3),\\ F_2&:\ (2\mid 2),\ (4\mid 1),\ (1\mid \emptyset),\ (3\mid 3),\\ F_3&:\ (2\mid 2),\ (4\mid 4),\ (1\mid \emptyset),\ (3\mid 3),\\ F_4&:\ (2\mid 4),\ (4\mid 1),\ (1\mid \emptyset),\ (3\mid 3). \end{aligned}\] Their data, in the order displayed, are \[\begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c} & \xvec^F & \maj(F) & \coinv(F) & \text{ordinary product factors} \\ \hline F_1 & x_1x_3x_4 & 0 & 0 & \dfrac{1-t}{1-qt^3} \\ F_2 & x_1x_2x_3 & 0 & 1 & \dfrac{1-t}{1-qt^2} \\ F_3 & x_2x_3x_4 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ F_4 & x_1x_3x_4 & 1 & 2 & \dfrac{1-t}{1-qt^3}\dfrac{1-t}{1-qt^2}. \end{array}\] Thus the filling formula gives \[\begin{aligned} \macdonaldE^{(2,4,1,3)}_{(1,1,0,1)}(\xvec;q,t) ={}& x_2x_3x_4 + x_1x_3x_4\frac{1-t}{1-qt^3} + x_1x_2x_3\,t\frac{1-t}{1-qt^2} \\ &\quad + x_1x_3x_4\,q t^2 \frac{(1-t)^2}{(1-qt^3)(1-qt^2)}. \end{aligned}\] This is the computation in [Ex. 2.13, MM25]. The third filling is the useful sanity check for the corrected product range: all ordinary entries equal the entry immediately to their left, so its product factor is \(1.\)

When \(\sigma = \omega_0,\) we recover the non-symmetric Macdonald polynomials defined in [HHL08], \(\macdonaldE_\alpha(\xvec;q,t).\) There is a slight difference in notation: the index \(\alpha\) is reversed compared to [HHL08].

A formula for the \(\macdonaldE^\sigma_\alpha\) using set-valued tableaux can be found in [Thm. 2.2, DR22]. The proof relies on a bijection with alcove walks. O. Mandelshtam, H. Niergarth, and K. Singh study the \(t=0\) specialization of these polynomials [MNS26]. They prove that every permuted basement Macdonald polynomial has a positive expansion in Demazure atoms at \(t=0,\) and describe the structure coefficients using charge on a restricted set of semistandard tableaux. D. Orr and J. Rivera refine the Concha–Lapointe partially symmetric Macdonald identity to a subfamily of permuted basement Macdonald polynomials and give a combinatorial proof [OR25]. They also relate the Concha–Lapointe identity to invariance of normalized partially symmetric Macdonald polynomials under the Kazhdan–Lusztig involution.

#Properties

Proposition (See [CMW18]).

Let \(\mu\) be a partition of length at most \(n,\) and let \(\macdonaldP_\mu(\xvec;q,t)\) denote the Macdonald P polynomials. Then \[\macdonaldP_\mu(\xvec;q,t) = \sum_{\sigma \in \symS_n(\mu)} \macdonaldE^{\rev(\sigma)}_{inc(\mu)}(\xvec;q,t),\] where \(inc(\mu)\) is the list of entries of \(\mu\) sorted in increasing order.

Conjecture (Olya Mandelshtam, 2019 personal communication).

For any fixed composition \(\mu,\) we can find coefficients \(R_{\mu}(q,t) \in \setQ(q,t)\) and some subset \(M \subseteq \symS_n\) such that \[R_{\mu}(q,t) \macdonaldP_{\lambda(\mu)}(\xvec;q,t) = \sum_{\sigma \in M} \macdonaldE^{\sigma}_{\mu}(\xvec;q,t).\]

Combining [Prop. 1.1, GR21] with [Eq. 1.10, GR21], one obtains an expansion \[\macdonaldP_{\lambda(\mu)}(\xvec;q,t) = \sum_{\sigma \in \symS_n} R'_{\mu,\alpha}(q,t) \macdonaldE^{\sigma}_\mu(\xvec;q,t),\] see also [Eq. 5.7.8, Mac96].

#Shape changing identities

In [MM26, MM25], the authors extend the row-swapping identities for the \(q=0\) specialization in [Prop. 5.5, AS19] to the full two-parameter family. Here \(s_i\cdot\alpha\) is obtained from \(\alpha\) by swapping \(\alpha_i\) and \(\alpha_{i+1},\) while \(\sigma s_i\) is obtained from \(\sigma\) by swapping \(\sigma_i\) and \(\sigma_{i+1}.\)

Theorem ([Thm. 1.1, MM26]).

Let \(\alpha\) be a weak composition with \(n\) parts, and suppose that \(\alpha_i=\alpha_{i+1}\) for some \(i\in[n-1].\) Then, for every \(\sigma\in\symS_n,\) \[\macdonaldE^\sigma_\alpha(\xvec;q,t) = \macdonaldE^{\sigma s_i}_\alpha(\xvec;q,t).\]

Theorem ([Thm. 1.3, MM26]).

Let \(\alpha\) be a weak composition with \(n\) parts, and suppose that \(\alpha_i\gt{}\alpha_{i+1}\) for some \(i\in[n-1].\) Then, for every \(\sigma\in\symS_n,\) \[\macdonaldE^\sigma_\alpha(\xvec;q,t) = \macdonaldE^{\sigma s_i}_{s_i\cdot\alpha}(\xvec;q,t) + c_{i,\alpha,\sigma}(q,t) \macdonaldE^\sigma_{s_i\cdot\alpha}(\xvec;q,t),\] where \[c_{i,\alpha,\sigma}(q,t) \coloneqq t^{\mathrm{twinv}(s_i\cdot\alpha,\sigma)-\mathrm{twinv}(\alpha,\sigma)} \frac{1-t}{1-q^{\leg(u)+1}t^{\arm(u)}} \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if } \sigma_i\gt{}\sigma_{i+1},\\ q^{\leg(u)+1}t^{\arm(u)}, & \text{if } \sigma_i\lt{}\sigma_{i+1}, \end{cases}\] in which \(u=(i+1,\alpha_{i+1}+1)\) is viewed as a box in the diagram \(s_i\cdot\alpha,\) and \(\leg(u)\) and \(\arm(u)\) are computed in that diagram. Furthermore, \[\mathrm{twinv}(\alpha,\sigma) \coloneqq \left|\{(k,l): k\lt l,\ \alpha_k\geq \alpha_l,\ \sigma_k\lt\sigma_l\}\right|.\]

#Quasisymmetric Macdonald E polynomials

The quasisymmetric Macdonald E polynomials are a quasisymmetric version of the non-symmetric Macdonald polynomials introduced in [CHMM+19].

They specialize to the quasisymmetric Schur polynomials at \(q=t=0.\)

Conjecture (Alexandersson 2020).

Let \(\alpha\) be a composition. Then the coefficients \(K_{\alpha\gamma}(q)\) in the expansion \[\macdonaldEQuasi_\alpha(\xvec;q,0) = \sum_{\gamma} K_{\alpha\gamma}(q) \schurQS_\gamma(\xvec)\] are in \(\setN[q].\) Note that this resembles the fact that \(\macdonaldE_\alpha(\xvec;q,0)\) are key-positive, with versions of Kostka–Foulkes polynomials as coefficients.

Bibliography

  1. [Ale19]Per Alexandersson. Non-symmetric Macdonald polynomials and Demazure–Lusztig operators. Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire, 76, 2019.
    .bib
    @article{Alexandersson2015gbMacdonald,
      author = {Per Alexandersson},
      title = {Non-symmetric {M}acdonald polynomials and {D}emazure--{L}usztig operators},
      journal = {Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire},
      volume = {76},
      year = {2019},
      url = {https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~slc/wpapers/s76alexand.html}
    }
    
  2. [AS17]Per Alexandersson and Mehtaab Sawhney. A major-index preserving map on fillings. Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 24(4):1–30, 2017.
    .bib
    @article{AlexanderssonSawhney2017,
      author = {Per Alexandersson and Mehtaab Sawhney},
      title = {A major-index preserving map on fillings},
      journal = {Electronic Journal of Combinatorics},
      number = {4},
      doi = {10.37236/6893},
      url2 = {http://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/v24i4p3},
      year = {2017},
      volume = {24},
      paper = {P3},
      pages = {1--30}
    }
    
  3. [AS19]Per Alexandersson and Mehtaab Sawhney. Properties of non-symmetric Macdonald polynomials at $q=1$ and $q=0$. Annals of Combinatorics, 23(2):219–239, May 2019.
    .bib
    @article{AlexanderssonSawhney2019,
      doi = {10.1007/s00026-019-00432-z},
      url2 = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-019-00432-z},
      volume = {23},
      number = {2},
      pages = {219--239},
      year = {2019},
      month = may,
      publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media {LLC}},
      author = {Per Alexandersson and Mehtaab Sawhney},
      title = {Properties of Non-symmetric {M}acdonald Polynomials at $q=1$ and $q=0$},
      journal = {Annals of Combinatorics}
    }
    
  4. [CHMM+19]Sylvie Corteel, James Haglund, Olya Mandelshtam, Sarah Mason and Lauren Williams. Compact formulas for Macdonald polynomials and quasisymmetric Macdonald polynomials. arXiv:1912.03390, 2019.
    .bib
    @article{CorteelMandelshtamMasonWilliams2019x,
    Author = {Sylvie Corteel and James Haglund and Olya Mandelshtam and Sarah Mason and Lauren Williams},
    Title = {Compact formulas for {M}acdonald polynomials and quasisymmetric {M}acdonald polynomials},
    Year = {2019},
    Eprint = {1912.03390},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03390},
    journal = {arXiv e-prints}
    }
    
  5. [CMW18]Sylvie Corteel, Olya Mandelshtam and Lauren Williams. From multiline queues to Macdonald polynomials via the exclusion process. arXiv:1811.01024, 2018.
    .bib
    @article{CorteelMandelshtamWilliams2018x,
    Author = {Sylvie Corteel and Olya Mandelshtam and Lauren Williams},
    Title = {From multiline queues to {M}acdonald polynomials via the exclusion process},
    Year = {2018},
    Eprint = {1811.01024},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.01024},
    journal = {arXiv e-prints}
    }
    
  6. [DR22]Zajj Daugherty and Arun Ram. Set-valued tableaux for Macdonald polynomials. arXiv:2212.04033, 2022.
    .bib
    @article{DaughertyRam2022x,
    Author = {Zajj Daugherty and Arun Ram},
    Title = {Set-valued tableaux for {M}acdonald polynomials},
    Year = {2022},
    Eprint = {2212.04033},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04033},
    }
    
  7. [Fer11]Jeffrey Paul Ferreira. Row-strict quasisymmetric Schur functions, characterizations of Demazure atoms, and permuted basement nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials. University of California Davis, 2011.
    .bib
    @PHDTHESIS{Ferreira2011,
      author = {Jeffrey Paul Ferreira},
      title = {Row-strict Quasisymmetric {S}chur Functions, Characterizations of {D}emazure Atoms, and Permuted Basement Nonsymmetric {M}acdonald Polynomials},
      school = {University of California Davis},
      year = {2011}
    }
    
  8. [GR21]Weiying Guo and Arun Ram. Comparing formulas for type $GL_n$ Macdonald polynomials. arXiv:2104.02942, 2021.
    .bib
    @article{GuoRam2021x,
    Author = {Weiying Guo and Arun Ram},
    Title = {Comparing formulas for type $GL_n$ {M}acdonald polynomials},
    Year = {2021},
    Eprint = {2104.02942},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.02942},
    journal = {arXiv e-prints}
    }
    
  9. [GR21]Weiying Guo and Arun Ram. Comparing formulas for type $GL_n$ Macdonald polynomials: supplement. arXiv:2104.04578, 2021.
    .bib
    @article{GuoRam2021xSupp,
    Author = {Weiying Guo and Arun Ram},
    Title = {Comparing formulas for type $GL_n$ {M}acdonald polynomials: Supplement},
    Year = {2021},
    Eprint = {2104.04578},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04578},
    journal = {arXiv e-prints}
    }
    
  10. [HHL08]James Haglund, Mark D. Haiman and Nicholas A. Loehr. A combinatorial formula for nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials. American Journal of Mathematics, 130(2):359–383, 2008.
    .bib
    @article{HaglundHaimanLoehr2008,
     ISSN = {00029327, 10806377},
     URL2 = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/40068131},
     doi = {10.1353/ajm.2008.0015},
     author = {James Haglund and Mark D. Haiman and Nicholas A. Loehr},
     journal = {American Journal of Mathematics},
     number = {2},
     pages = {359--383},
     publisher = {The Johns Hopkins University Press},
     title = {A combinatorial formula for nonsymmetric {M}acdonald polynomials},
     volume = {130},
     year = {2008}
    }
    
  11. [Mac96]Ian G. Macdonald. Affine Hecke algebras and orthogonal polynomials. Séminaire bourbaki, 1994/95:189–207, 1996.
    .bib
    @incollection{Macdonald1996,
         author = {Ian G. Macdonald},
         title = {Affine {H}ecke algebras and orthogonal polynomials},
         booktitle = {S{\'{e}}minaire Bourbaki},
         volume = {1994/95},
         series = {Ast{\'{e}}risque},
         publisher = {Soci{\'{e}}t{\'{e}} Math{\'{e}}matique de France},
         issue = {237},
         year = {1996},
         pages = {189--207},
         zbl = {0883.33008},
         language = {en}
    }
    
  12. [MNS26]Olya Mandelshtam, Harper Niergarth and Kartik Singh. Positive expansions of permuted basement and quasisymmetric Macdonald polynomials at $t=0$. arXiv:2601.04409, 2026.
    .bib
    @article{MandelshtamNiergarthSingh2026x,
      author = {Olya Mandelshtam and Harper Niergarth and Kartik Singh},
      title = {Positive expansions of permuted basement and quasisymmetric {M}acdonald polynomials at $t=0$},
      year = {2026},
      eprint = {2601.04409},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04409},
      journal = {arXiv e-prints}
    }
    
  13. [Mas09]Sarah K. Mason. An explicit construction of type A Demazure atoms. Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics, 29(3):295–313, 2009.
    .bib
    @article{Mason2009,
      year={2009},
      issn={0925-9899},
      journal={Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics},
      volume={29},
      number={3},
      title={An explicit construction of type {A} {D}emazure atoms},
      doi={10.1007/s10801-008-0133-4},
      publisher={Springer US},
      keywords={Symmetric functions; Young tableaux; Demazure characters},
      author={Sarah K. Mason},
      pages={295--313}
    }
    
  14. [MM25]Guilherme Zeus Dantas Moura and Olya Mandelshtam. Probabilistic entry swapping bijections for non-attacking fillings. arXiv:2503.06051, 2025.
    .bib
    @article{MouraMandelshtam2025x,
      author = {Guilherme Zeus Dantas e Moura and Olya Mandelshtam},
      title = {Probabilistic Entry Swapping Bijections for Non-Attacking Fillings},
      year = {2025},
      eprint = {2503.06051},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06051},
      journal = {arXiv e-prints}
    }
    
  15. [MM26]Guilherme Zeus Dantas Moura and Olya Mandelshtam. Shape changing identities for permuted-basement nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials. arXiv:2606.02395, 2026.
    .bib
    @article{MouraMandelshtam2026x,
      author = {Guilherme Zeus Dantas e Moura and Olya Mandelshtam},
      title = {Shape changing identities for permuted-basement nonsymmetric {M}acdonald polynomials},
      year = {2026},
      eprint = {2606.02395},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02395},
      journal = {arXiv e-prints}
    }
    
  16. [OR25]Daniel Orr and Johnny Rivera. Combinatorial proof of a permuted basement Macdonald polynomial identity. arXiv:2508.20337, 2025.
    .bib
    @article{OrrRivera2025x,
      author = {Daniel Orr and Johnny Rivera},
      title = {Combinatorial proof of a permuted basement {M}acdonald polynomial
        identity},
      year = {2025},
      eprint = {2508.20337},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20337},
      journal = {arXiv e-prints}
    }
    
  17. [Sag19]The Sage Developers. SageMath, the Sage Mathematics Software System Version 8.6. http://www.sagemath.org, 2019.
    .bib
    @misc{Sage,
    	AUTHOR = {The {Sage Developers}},
    	TITLE = {SageMath, the {S}age {M}athematics {S}oftware {S}ystem {V}ersion 8.6},
    	HOWPUBLISHED = {\url{http://www.sagemath.org}},
    	YEAR = {2019}
    }
    

I use cookies to detect website issues and track search terms.