#A gamma interpretation for A046739

This page is part of the OEIS proof collection.

Let \(\mathcal{D}_n\) be the set of derangements of \([n]=\{1,\dotsc,n\},\) that is, permutations with no fixed point. An excedance of \(\sigma\) is an index \(i\) with \(i\lt{}\sigma(i)\); we write \(\operatorname{exc}(\sigma)\) for their number. The derangement excedance polynomial \[D_n(t)\coloneqq\sum_{\sigma\in\mathcal{D}_n} t^{\operatorname{exc}(\sigma)}\] is the row polynomial of A046739. An ascending run is a maximal consecutive increasing subword in one-line notation; a singleton run has length one. A value \(i\) is a double excedance of \(\sigma\) if \(\sigma^{-1}(i)\lt{}i\lt{}\sigma(i).\)

Theorem

For \(n\geq 1,\) we have \[D_n(t)=\sum_{r=0}^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor} \xi(n,r)t^r(1+t)^{n-2r},\] where \(\xi(n,r)\) counts either of the following classes:

  • permutations of \([n]\) with \(r\) ascending runs and no singleton run;

  • derangements of \([n]\) with \(r\) excedances and no double excedance.

This is [AS12, Thm. 1.4]. We outline its orbit proof below.

#The orbit proof

Proof

A descent of a word \(w=w_1\dotsm w_n\) is a position \(i\lt{}n\) with \(w_i\gt{}w_{i+1}\); let \(\operatorname{des}(w)\) count these positions. Let \(E_n\) consist of permutations in which every left-to-right maximum (an entry larger than all preceding entries) is followed by a smaller entry. Write each cycle of a permutation with its largest entry first, order the cycles by increasing largest entry, and erase the parentheses; call this fundamental transformation \(\varphi.\) Then \(\sigma\mapsto\varphi(\sigma^{-1})\) is a bijection \(\mathcal{D}_n\to E_n\) satisfying \(\operatorname{exc}(\sigma)=\operatorname{des}(\varphi(\sigma^{-1})).\)

Set \(w_0=0\) and \(w_{n+1}=n+1.\) A double ascent is an entry \(w_i\) with \(w_{i-1}\lt{}w_i\lt{}w_{i+1}\); a double descent has both inequalities reversed. The modified Foata–Strehl action on \(E_n\) moves a double-ascent entry left to the nearest gap \(w_j\gt{}w_i\gt{}w_{j+1},\) and moves a double-descent entry right to the nearest gap \(w_j\lt{}w_i\lt{}w_{j+1}.\) These inverse moves preserve \(E_n\) and toggle the status of the moved entry. The toggles indexed by entries commute, and each orbit has a unique representative with no double descent.

A peak satisfies \(w_{i-1}\lt{}w_i\gt{}w_{i+1},\) and a valley satisfies \(w_{i-1}\gt{}w_i\lt{}w_{i+1}.\) If that representative has \(r\) descents, it has \(r\) peaks and \(r\) valleys; the remaining \(n-2r\) entries are double ascents. Toggling any subset of them increases the descent number by the subset size. Thus its orbit contributes \[\sum_{u\in\mathcal{O}(w)}t^{\operatorname{des}(u)} =t^r(1+t)^{n-2r}.\] Under \(\varphi(\sigma^{-1}),\) the representatives correspond exactly to derangements with \(r\) excedances and no double excedance. For such a derangement \(\sigma,\) the word \(\varphi(\sigma)\) has \(r\) descending runs and no singleton run. Complementing its entries (\(i\mapsto n+1-i\)) gives the ascending-run model. Summing the orbit contributions proves the expansion and both interpretations; see [AS12, proof of Thm. 1.4, pp. 18–19].

H. Sun and Y. Wang give the same orbit factor directly on derangements using a cyclic modified Foata–Strehl action [SW14, Thm. 5 and Cor. 6]. Its unique representative has no cyclic double ascent, which is precisely the condition of having no double excedance defined above.

#Example and shifted normalization

For \(n=4,\) \[D_4(t)=t+7t^2+t^3=t(1+t)^2+5t^2.\] The ascending-run model consists of \(1234\) with one run, and \(1324,1423,2314,2413,3412\) with two runs of length two. Hence \(\xi(4,1)=1\) and \(\xi(4,2)=5.\)

For the shifted normalization \(P_m(t)\coloneqq D_{m+4}(t)/t,\) \(m\geq0,\) write \[P_m(t)=\sum_{j=0}^{\lfloor(m+2)/2\rfloor} \gamma(m,j)t^j(1+t)^{m+2-2j}.\] Dividing the expansion of \(D_{m+4}\) by \(t\) and setting \(r=j+1\) gives \(\gamma(m,j)=\xi(m+4,j+1).\) Finally, summing \(\xi(n,r)\) over \(r\) forgets the number of runs and gives A097899\((n),\) the number of permutations with no singleton ascending run.

Bibliography

  1. [AS12]Christos A. Athanasiadis and Christina Savvidou. The local $h$-vector of the cluster subdivision of a simplex. Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire, 66:B66c, 2012.
    .bib
    @article{AthanasiadisSavvidou2012,
      author = {Christos A. Athanasiadis and Christina Savvidou},
      title = {The local $h$-vector of the cluster subdivision of a simplex},
      journal = {S\'eminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire},
      volume = {66},
      pages = {B66c},
      year = {2012},
      eprint = {1204.0362},
      url = {https://www.emis.de/journals/SLC/wpapers/s66athasav.pdf}
    }
    
  2. [SW14]Hua Sun and Yi Wang. A group action on derangements. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 21(1):P1.67, 2014.
    .bib
    @article{SunWang2014,
      author = {Hua Sun and Yi Wang},
      title = {A group action on derangements},
      journal = {The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics},
      volume = {21},
      number = {1},
      pages = {P1.67},
      year = {2014},
      doi = {10.37236/3723},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.37236/3723}
    }
    

I use cookies to detect website issues and track search terms.